Over one in five people in the UK are living in poverty including 3.9 million children and 1.7 million pensioners because of the cost of living and economic exploitation, so why is the mainstream media and the Sunak government focused on immigration boats?
According to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation: “Around one in five of our population (20%) were in poverty in 2020/21 – that’s 13.4 million people.” Around one in five of our population (20%) were in poverty in 2020/21 – that’s 13.4 million people.
Low income households are suffering the most as many families are unable to afford the essentials, such as basic foods, and the ability to pay their rent, energy, and other utility bills. The growth of food banks is increasing, as people struggle to feed their children and families.
On the upside, Shell, BP, and British Gas, has made billions in profits off the poorest people in the UK, because of the war in the Ukraine they say. Why are energy companies making so much money, and why are my bills so high? All your questions answered as Centrica reports £3.3BN profits after BP and Shell boast record earnings.
So, I ask, why is the mainstream media , and the Sunak government focusing on immigration boats? Are these thousands of immigrants making billions off poor UK families?
The Federation of Small Businesses said that 53% of UK firms expect to go bust or shrink in the coming months. ‘Lost generation’: small businesses folding across UK as energy bills land.
Over 32 pubs in England and Wales are closing every month because of rising living costs and staff shortages. Yet, the mainstream media and the Sunak government want to discuss the immigration boats. More than 32 pubs in England and Wales closed each month in 2022, data reveals.
The immigrants Are Taking Our Jobs! No, It’s Actually The Robots
If you think that the immigrants coming over on the boats are taking your jobs. Think again. According to a report by Goldman Sachs, 300 million jobs worldwide could be affected by AI, and two-thirds of jobs in the U.S. and Europe will be affected by AI. Which Jobs Will AI Replace? These 4 Industries Will Be Heavily Impacted.
Kristian Hammond, chief scientist of Natural Sciences, says that 90% of news will be written by AI. So, any budding journalist or media student should think carefully before pursuing a career in this industry.
Banks and financial services have already started using AI, and the predictions are that the trend will continue.
ChatGTP has the ability to summarise complex legal questions and discussion which is a threat to jobs in the legal profession.
In manufacturing the AI revolution has been devastating. “A Chinese factory in Dongguan City replaced 90% of its workforce with machines, resulting in a 250% increase in productivity and an 80% decrease in defects. A job that took 650 human workers to complete now takes about 60 robots and 60 humans, the company claims.”
In the name of efficiency humans are no longer seen as efficient, but our loving politicians, and the maternal mainstream media continue to remind us daily that thousands of people are coming over on boats in Dover to take our jobs, accomodation, and resources. I’m not that clever, but even I can smell a rat!
King’s Triple Evils Concerns All Races
Reverend Martin Luther King identified three social factors which needed to be challenged and defeated, and were interlinked with each other. These are racism, economic exploitation, and war.
I believe that his message appeals to all humans rather than one particular racial group.
When I wrote the article Corporate Crimes Against Humanity Are Worse Than The Crimes of The Nazis, I wanted to demonstrate to readers that the evil which has been committed by corporations upon every human race in the name of financial greed, and power, should unite us all against a common and elusive enemy.
When Hackney MP, Diane Abbott vented her frustration at Tomiwa Owolade’s article, Racism in Britain is not a black and white issue. It’s far more complicated, I understood her frustration. Racism is black and white, but I also believe that progressive black people, as well as all people, must evolve in their understanding of how racism has been used as a tool by the rich to exploit every group in society.
King arrived at this conclusion during the Vietnam war. He said:
“The greatest purveyor of violence in the world today is my own government. For the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent. Look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa, and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the country. This is a role our nation has taken, … refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that comes from the immense profits of overseas investments. This is not just”.
King was assassinated in my view because he began to reach out to all people, rather than just African-Americans, against a common enemy.
Whether it is Vietnam in King’s time, or the Ukraine today, individual capitalists of the west seem to profit from human misery, and while we all fight amongst each other, the same individuals are getting richer.
I was once like Abbott, fiercely holding on to terms and definitions as if they were my life, until I realised one day after research and reading that many black organisations are funded by the same billionaires that are shaping the future and investing in conflict. We Need An Alternative To Black Lives Matter. This triggered a mental revolution in my mind and made me see see past narrow racial paradigms.
If black organisations can be funded by billionaires, then it is logical that so can white nationalist organisations. Brexit was funded by hedge fund millionaires, so you have to ask yourself the question, why profit-driven multi-millionaires would want to invest in poor white communities? Nigel Farage targets hedge funds as key to Ukip’s financial future.
These investors are interested in power and profit. This is all a game to them, and the people in these deprived communities are their pawns.
Billionaires are funding both the left, the right, and the centre of politics, and believe that totalitarian governments is the future of the western world. America’s billionaire class is funding anti-democratic forces .
The rise of anti immigration political parties in Europe and the UK can be traced to financial donations from rich, US Christian Conservatives.The American dark money behind Europe’s far right.
Promoting Global National Identities And Sovereignty
You may agree with closing the borders and you may even agree with the slogan British jobs for British workers, but if you do not address economic exploitation, not just in the UK, but also abroad, then you are naively falling for the same globalist policies that these nationalist political parties claim to be against.
The British National Party states that asylum seekers are costing the taxpayer 6.8 million pounds a day in accomodation costs. THE SCALE OF BRITAIN’S UNWANTED MIGRANTS REVEALED, AND THE NUMBER OF HOTELS USED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO HOUSE THEM, AT THE COST OF £7 MILLION PER DAY PAID FOR BY TAXPAYERS.
They also said that in February of this year over 2,800 invaders came to Britain across the channel.
Have you noticed how these nationalist parties rarely talk about the causes of immigration and asylum seekers?
In my post Britain’s Foreign Policy Is The Main Cause Of Immigration, I cite The Refugee Project, a coalition of refugee communities and organisations working to address the issues that UK foreign investment plays a role in forcing people to flee their countries. They said:
“The vast majority of refugees today are fleeing conflict, or social or economic oppression – and the vast majority of the world’s refugees live in the countries of Asia and Africa; less than 2% make it to Britain. In many cases, the British government, companies and taxpayers are directly and indirectly supporting a multitude of human rights abuses that often go with British overseas investment and policies, some of which ultimately force people to flee their homes and then their countries .”
“These investments have not just been the more obvious ones, such as waging war or allowing the export of weapons. They also include supporting large infrastructure projects, such as hydro-electric and irrigation dams, oil and gas pipelines, and mines.” (http://www.therefugeeproject.org/Home.htm)
I cited The Campaign Against Arms Trade (CATT), a London-based organisation which aims to eradicate the international arms trade.
They said that:
“For decades the UK Government has had a policy of promoting arms exports, seemingly at any cost. The result of this policy is that the UK continues to arm repressive regimes around the world. In 2000, the UK licensed military exports to 30 of the 40 most repressive regimes in the world and British weapons are being used in most of the world’s current conflicts.”
The report states that £760 million pounds of British taxpayers money is used to subsidise the arms industry.
In light of these facts the main cause of mass immigration and asylum seekers coming to Britain is economic exploitation and war, but European nationalist parties never tell ther members that, why?
The majority of the news on nationalist websites is about mass immigration and Muslims which conveniently overlooks the main reasons to why Britain is not able to act in the interest of its own people, so my next question is, are you being deceived?
If nationalists want to genuinely address national sovereignty and the causes of mass immigration, then they must address at least two out of the three triple evils identified by Reverend King. Economic exploitation, and war. That would mean focusing their attention on the global financial elite, and I can confidently tell you, that they are not immigrants, nor asylum seekers.
In fact, I would argue that a global movement which promotes ethical nationalism based on challenging racism, economic exploitation, and war, would be far more of a threat ot the financial elite than nationalist political parties who seem to just want to blame all of society’s ills on mass immigration.
The next time you read an article, or hear the news on television talking about mass immigration, ask yourself, am I being misdirected?
Subscribe to our newsletter!
